FIRED Black MSNBC Host ATTACKS Stephen A. Smith After HE EXPOSED Jasmine Crockett
Stephen A. Smith Faces Backlash for Democrat Criticism
Estimated read time: 7 minutes
Quick Summary
- Stephen A. Smith criticized for questioning Democratic representatives’ approach to governance
- Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s refusal to work with Trump draws scrutiny
- Panel suggests Black men should “ban” Stephen A. Smith for independent views
- Brandon Tatum exposes Democratic Party’s historical civil rights record
Table of Contents
- Stephen A. Smith’s Principled Stand
- Jasmine Crockett’s Capitol Hill Controversy
- The Democratic Party’s Civil Rights History
- Panel Attacks Stephen A. Smith’s Character
- The Price of Political Independence
- Key Takeaways
- Final Thoughts
Stephen A. Smith’s Principled Stand Against Democratic Tactics
Stephen A. Smith is now considering some of the things that the Democrats are doing that he disagrees with, and according to Brandon Tatum, he’s 100% right about it. This stance from ESPN’s prominent sports commentator represents a significant moment in political discourse, as more public figures question party loyalty over principle.
Tatum, who has interviewed Stephen A. Smith three times and maintains regular communication with him, describes the ESPN host as “a good dude” whose political takes are “very fair and balanced.” Despite never voting for Trump and disagreeing on various political points, Stephen A. Smith is standing on principle rather than falling in line with party expectations.
Jasmine Crockett’s Capitol Hill Controversy
Texas Representative Jasmine Crockett has drawn criticism for her approach to working with the Trump administration, particularly her public statements about refusing to cooperate with the president.
What Jasmine Crockett Actually Said
According to the transcript, Crockett stated: “I cast my no vote because ain’t nobody come at me and ask me what the people in my district need. They didn’t ask me what would look good for those in South Dallas.”
She further emphasized her position: “I don’t work for him. He can’t hire me. He can’t fire me. The people that elected me in Texas 30 did. So unless you want to have a conversation with me about the priorities for the people in my district, baby, you’re not getting this vote.”
Stephen A. Smith’s Response to Representatives
Stephen A. Smith’s criticism of this approach was direct and principled. He argued that when representatives go on national television “calling the president of the United States out” and being disrespectful, they’re not doing what Texas citizens sent them to do.
He emphasized: “They expect you to go to Capitol Hill and figure out a way to maneuver yourself through that terrain to work in a fashion that’s going to facilitate getting things done on behalf of your constituents. That’s your job.”
His key point was clear: “Excuse my language on SiriusXM, but it ain’t your job to say he ain’t worth a damn. That’s not your job. Anybody can do that. You’re supposed to be figuring out a way to get things done.”
The Democratic Party’s Civil Rights History Nobody Talks About
Brandon Tatum presented historical facts about the Democratic Party’s record on civil rights that rarely get discussed in mainstream media. These aren’t opinions but documented historical voting records.
Historical Voting Records on Civil Rights
- The Democratic Party was literally the party of slavery
- Democrats did not vote for the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments
- Republicans unanimously voted for these amendments that freed Black people, gave them citizenship, and granted voting rights
- Democrats filibustered the Civil Rights Act in the longest filibuster in United States history
- Republicans unanimously voted for the Civil Rights Act while Democrats obstructed it
- Joe Biden led the filibuster against the Civil Rights Act
Tatum questions why Black Americans would remain loyal to “a political party that don’t do nothing for black people” given this documented historical record. He faces constant criticism, with people calling him an “Uncle Tom sellout” for not believing in the Democratic Party.
Panel Suggests Black Men Should ‘Ban’ Stephen A. Smith
A recent panel discussion featured harsh personal attacks against Stephen A. Smith for his independent political views. The criticism went beyond political disagreement into character assassination.
Shocking Personal Attacks
One panelist characterized Stephen A. Smith and similar thinkers as having “some absolute pure self-hating little energy nonsense from that half-witted idiot basking in the non-existent rays of his own ignorance.”
The same panelist went further, suggesting: “It is sad to me that he even gets an audience of black men. Like why aren’t black men right now saying Stephen A. Smith, we ban him. We not listening to his podcast. We’re not watching his show anymore.”
Inappropriate Sexual Commentary
The panel discussion descended into inappropriate territory, with comments about “little pee pee energy” being made. Tatum rightfully questions why these attacks often become sexual in nature when certain Black women attack Black men who don’t align with their political views.
Tatum asks: “Why you got to say little pee pee energy? Ma’am, why you worrying about that man Johnson? Ain’t that crazy when some of these black women attack a man, they want to attack your penis and then they want to attack, say you gay or something?”
The Price of Political Independence for Black Voices
The controversy reveals a deeper issue within political discourse – the inability to accept diverse viewpoints within racial communities. Tatum points out the irony that while critics call for boycotting Stephen A. Smith, he just signed a hundred million dollar contract with ESPN.
The Real Cost of Groupthink
The panelist claimed “That’s what black women do. We organize.” But Tatum questions whether organizing to silence different opinions within your own community is productive.
He notes: “She said they should ban his podcast. He just signed a hundred million dollar contract with ESPN. Well, go ahead and throw him away then. Don’t throw your brother away. The white people take him right in.”
Black Women’s Success vs. Victim Mentality
One panelist claimed to “sit at the intersection of being black and being women,” positioning herself as a victim. Tatum challenges this narrative with facts:
“Black women are the most educated women out of all women of any race. Black women entrepreneurially are more entrepreneur and they make more money, bang for their buck with their education more than black men do.”
He questions: “So why are you being a victim when you can be a victor? Why are you acting like the white man is holding you down and y’all got a show and you can do anything you want to do?”
Key Takeaways / FAQ
Q: Has Stephen A. Smith ever voted for Donald Trump?
A: No, Stephen A. Smith has never voted for Donald Trump, but he takes fair and balanced positions and stands on principle rather than party loyalty.
Q: What is Jasmine Crockett’s stance on working with Trump?
A: She stated that she doesn’t work for Trump, he can’t hire or fire her, and she was elected by the people of Texas District 30 to serve them, not him. She cast a no vote because nobody asked what her district needs.
Q: Why does Brandon Tatum face “Uncle Tom” accusations?
A: He faces these accusations because he doesn’t believe in a political party that historically didn’t vote for Black freedom, citizenship, or voting rights, choosing instead to think independently.
Q: What was the Democratic Party’s position on the Civil Rights Act?
A: Democrats filibustered the Civil Rights Act in the longest filibuster in United States history, while Republicans unanimously voted for it. Joe Biden led the filibuster effort.
Final Thoughts: The Courage to Think Independently
The backlash against Stephen A. Smith reveals an uncomfortable truth about modern political discourse – independent thought is often punished more harshly than opposition. As Brandon Tatum points out, Stephen A. Smith is “standing on principle” and maintaining “fair and balanced” positions, even when they don’t align with expected Democratic talking points.
The suggestion that Black men should collectively “ban” Stephen A. Smith for exercising independent political thought represents the exact groupthink that keeps communities from progressing. With his new hundred million dollar ESPN contract, Stephen A. Smith clearly isn’t suffering from his principled stance, but the attacks reveal how threatening independent political thought can be to those demanding conformity.
The real question isn’t whether Stephen A. Smith is right or wrong about every political position. It’s whether we can accept that people within our communities can disagree politically while still respecting each other as brothers and sisters. As Tatum concludes: “Don’t throw your brother away.”
Go watch the full video. Share it. Talk about it. Don’t let propaganda win.
About Brandon Tatum
Brandon Tatum, known as “The Officer Tatum,” is a former police officer, author, entrepreneur, and one of the boldest conservative voices in America today. He speaks truth with conviction, challenges lies with facts, and isn’t afraid to take the heat for standing with what’s right. Follow him on YouTube, Twitter/X, and The Officer Tatum Store.
